Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Birmingham Home
Help & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at University of Birmingham
Home
Research output
Profiles
Research units
Projects
Activities
Datasets
Equipment
Prizes
Press/Media
The Quest for a Satisfactory Definition of Terrorism: R v Gul
Alan Greene
Birmingham Law School
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
5
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Quest for a Satisfactory Definition of Terrorism: R v Gul'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Definition of Terrorism
100%
Misapplication
33%
Military Force
33%
High Profile
33%
Judicial Review
33%
UK Supreme Court
33%
Counterterror Measures
33%
Terrorist
33%
Prosecutorial Discretion
33%
Supreme Court
33%
Anti-terrorism Law
33%
Acts of Terrorism
33%
Supreme Court Judgments
33%
Obiter Dicta
33%
Arts and Humanities
Supreme Court
100%
Review
50%
Reform
50%
Absurd
50%
dictum
50%
reliance
50%
Military Force
50%
Social Sciences
UK
100%
Courts
100%
Legislation
50%
Armed Forces
50%
Court Judgment
50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Terrorism
100%