The Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour in Sport Scale : further evidence for construct validity and reliability

Maria Kavussanu, Nicholas Stanger, Ian Boardley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Citations (Scopus)
562 Downloads (Pure)


The purpose of this research was to provide further evidence for the construct validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity) of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour in Sport Scale (PABSS), an instrument that has four subscales measuring prosocial and antisocial behaviour toward teammates and opponents. We also investigated test-retest reliability and stability of the PABSS. We conducted three studies using athletes from a variety of team sports. In Study 1, participants (N = 129) completed the PABSS and measures of physical and verbal aggression, hostility, anger, moral identity, and empathy; a sub-sample (n = 111) also completed the PABSS one week later. In Study 2, in addition to the PABSS, participants (N = 89) completed measures of competitive aggressiveness and anger, moral attitudes, moral disengagement, goal orientation, and anxiety. In Study 3, participants (N = 307) completed the PABSS and a measure of social goals. Across the three studies, the four subscales evidenced the hypothesised relationships with a number of variables. Correlations were large between the two antisocial behaviours and small between the two prosocial behaviours. Overall, the findings supported the convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity of the scale, provided evidence for its test-retest reliability and stability, and suggest that the instrument is a valid and reliable measure of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in sport.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1208-1221
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Issue number11
Early online date11 Mar 2013
Publication statusPublished - 2013


  • item stability
  • discriminant
  • convergent
  • concurrent


Dive into the research topics of 'The Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviour in Sport Scale : further evidence for construct validity and reliability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this