The Performance of Cross-Border Units in China: A Test of Natural Selection, Strategic Choice and Contingency Theories

John Child, L Chung, H Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

131 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tests the explanatory power of three theoretical frameworks for the performance of cross-border affiliates, by examining the experience of 615 Hong Kong firms managing operations in mainland China. The frameworks tested are: the natural selection approach, focused on the influence of the environment; the strategic choice approach, focused on managerial action; and the contingency approach, which emphasises the 'fit' between environmental contingencies and internal organisation. The results show that natural selection and strategic choice have a role to play, even when controlling for each other. They also support a simple approach to contingency, but not a more complex version involving interactions. Although the business and institutional environments do have a significant influence on the performance of cross-border affiliates in a transition economy, performance can be improved through strategic managerial action. In particular, leveraging local resources by developing trust between parent and affiliate, and maintaining close control and integration with the parent, are associated with enhanced performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-254
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of International Business Studies
Volume34
Issue number3
Early online date1 May 2003
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2003

Keywords

  • Hong Kong
  • environment
  • performance
  • cross-border investment
  • management
  • China

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Performance of Cross-Border Units in China: A Test of Natural Selection, Strategic Choice and Contingency Theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this