The neutral order of things: Race, faith and schooling in liberal democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines young people’s engagement with issues of race and faith equality in school against the backdrop of right-wing political shifts in England and globally, focusing on the politics of impartiality or neutrality. We use data from a survey of 3,156 Year-10 pupils across 29 state-funded secondary schools in England. Data were analysed using multinomial logistic regression. The findings reveal a significant correlation between teacher behaviours and pupil engagement. We show, for example, that discussion of Black Lives Matter and ‘white privilege’ in school, while often depicted in right-wing discourse as ‘divisive’ and ‘woke indoctrination’, significantly increases the likelihood of pupils saying that their teachers encourage them to express their views and think independently. We argue that contemporary impartiality policy in education is not neutral but reflects the ‘neutral order of things’, i.e. a ‘hegemonic intervention’ aimed at aligning schooling and political education with right-wing social and political ideals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)955-973
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Sociology of Education
Volume46
Issue number7-8
Early online date26 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Political impartiality
  • public schooling
  • free expression
  • civic education
  • race equality
  • faith equality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The neutral order of things: Race, faith and schooling in liberal democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this