The lack of robust evidence for the effects of alcohol on false memory

Heather Flowe, Nadja Schreiber Compo

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

We comment on Kloft et al.'s (2021) review of the effects of alcohol and other drugs on false memory reporting. Across studies, problems of internal and external validity and methodological consistency preclude any blanket conclusions and recommendations regarding alcohol's effects on false memory reporting and suggestibility in witnesses. We argue that any policy and practice conclusions drawn from this limited literature are premature and would be unfairly prejudicial to witnesses and confusing to triers of fact at this time.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-333
Number of pages2
JournalNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
Volume127
Early online date4 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Drugs
  • False memory
  • Intoxication
  • Suggestibility
  • Suspect
  • Victim
  • Witness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The lack of robust evidence for the effects of alcohol on false memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this