Abstract
In this paper we respond to Benjamin Crowe's criticisms in this issue of our discussion of the grounds of worship. We clarify our previous position, and examine Crowe's account of what it is about God's nature that might ground our obligation to worship Him. We find Crowe's proposals no more persuasive than the accounts that we examined in our previous paper, and conclude that theists still owe us an account of what it is in virtue of which we have obligations to worship God.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 475-480 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Religious Studies |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2007 |