Abstract
Bi-level optimisation problems have gained increasing interest in the field of combinatorial optimisation in recent years. With this paper, we start the runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms for bi-level optimisation problems. We examine the NP-hard generalised minimum spanning tree problem and analyse the two approaches presented by Hu and Raidl [7] in the context of parameterised complexity (with respect to the number of clusters) that distinguish each other by the chosen representation of possible solutions. Our results show that a (1+1) EA working with the spanning nodes representation is not a fixed-parameter evolutionary algorithm for the problem, whereas the global structure representation enables to solve the problem in fixed-parameter time. Furthermore, we present hard instances for each approach and show that the two approaches are highly complementary by proving that they solve each other's hard instances very efficiently.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | GECCO 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference |
| Pages | 519-525 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| Event | 2013 15th Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2013 - Amsterdam, Netherlands Duration: 6 Jul 2013 → 10 Jul 2013 |
Conference
| Conference | 2013 15th Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2013 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Netherlands |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Period | 6/07/13 → 10/07/13 |
Keywords
- Bi-level optimisation
- Combinatorial optimisation
- Evolutionary algorithms
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Genetics
- Computational Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The generalized minimum spanning tree problem: A parameterized complexity analysis of Bi-level optimisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver