Abstract
Community opposition to locally unwanted development is not inherently problematic, but it can be destructive where conflict between proponents and objectors escalates. This paper relates mixed-methods findings from a Sydney case-study where opposition to planned affordable housing projects was widespread but uneven. Five factors are identified that escalated individual opposition campaigns in this case: public notification procedures; sense of injustice; prejudice; strong campaign leadership; and the involvement of politicians. We argue that these factors will likely also escalate opposition to the planned development of other forms of critical social infrastructure, and that an understanding of them can help minimise destructive conflicts between proponents and host communities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 386-400 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Urban Policy and Research |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research.
Keywords
- Affordable housing
- conflict escalation
- land-use conflict
- NIMBY
- planning process
- Sydney
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Urban Studies