The evolution of a legal genre: Rhetorical moves in British patent specifications, 1711 to 1860

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter provides a diachronic corpus-based analysis of a vitally important, yet currently very under-researched, legal genre: the patent specification. The empirical focus of the analysis is on changes in the rhetorical move structure of the patent specification genre over the first 150 years of its existence, as represented by a corpus of British patent specification texts ranging from 1711 to 1860. The methodology of the study involves reducing each exemplar text in the corpus to a simple letter code string representing its rhetorical move structure, and then submitting the resulting list of code strings to two kinds of computational analysis: one focusing on the frequency and distribution of individual rhetorical moves over the period of the study, and the other focusing on the frequency and distribution of the different move sequence types attested in the corpus. It is argued that the findings of the study are consistent with, and may thus be interpreted as providing empirical support for, generalized evolutionary theoretical models of genre change.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCorpus-based research on variation in English legal discourse
EditorsTeresa Fanego, Paula Rodríguez-Puente
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing
Chapter9
Pages201-234
Number of pages34
Volume91
ISBN (Electronic)9789027262837
ISBN (Print)9789027202352
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Evolution
  • Genre change
  • Move analysis
  • Patent
  • Replication
  • Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Education
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of a legal genre: Rhetorical moves in British patent specifications, 1711 to 1860'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this