Abstract
In spring 2024, the European Union formally adopted the AI Act, aimed at creating a comprehensive legal regime to regulate AI systems. In so doing, the Union sought to maintain a harmonized and competitive single market for AI in Europe while demonstrating its commitment to protect core EU values against AI's adverse effects. In this chapter, we question whether this new regulation will succeed in translating its noble aspirations into meaningful and effective protection for people whose lives are affected by AI systems. By critically examining the proposed conceptual vehicles and regulatory architecture upon which the AI Act relies, we argue there are good reasons for skepticism, as many of its key operative provisions delegate critical regulatory tasks to AI providers themselves, without adequate oversight or redress mechanisms. Despite its laudable intentions, the AI Act may deliver far less than it promises.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Ethics, Policy and Artificial Intelligence |
| Editors | Nathalie A. Smuha |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Chapter | 12 |
| Pages | 228-258 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009367790 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781009367813 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- artificial intellegence
- AI Act
- technical standardisation
- enforcement
- AI regulation
- data
- Risk-based approach
- high-risk system
- general-purpose AI
- meta-regulation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The European Union's AI Act: Beyond Motherhood and Apple Pie?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver