The enduring potential of justified hypernorms

M. Scholz, Craig Smith, Gaston de los Reyes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The profound influence of Thomas Donaldson and Thomas Dunfee’s integrative social contracts theory (ISCT) on the field of business ethics has been challenged by Andreas Scherer and Guido Palazzo’s Habermasian approach, which has achieved prominence of late with articles that expressly question the defensibility of ISCT’s hypernorms. This article builds on recent efforts by Donaldson and Scherer to bridge their accounts by providing discursive foundations to the hypernorms at the heart of the ISCT framework. Extending prior literature, we propose an ISCT* framework designed to retain ISCT’s practical virtue of managerial guidance while answering the demands of Scherer and Palazzo’s discursive account. By subscribing to a suitable portfolio of discursively justified hypernorms, we argue, companies unlock the valuable moral guidance of ISCT*, which says to treat these hypernorms as unequivocal outer bounds to the pursuit of business and as a starting point to tailor local norms through discursive stakeholder engagement.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)317-342
    Number of pages26
    JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    Early online date6 Mar 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

    Keywords

    • discourse ethics
    • human rights
    • hypernorms
    • integrative social contracts theory
    • legitimacy
    • multi-stakeholder initiatives

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The enduring potential of justified hypernorms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this