The effectiveness of a posted information package on the beliefs and behavior of musculoskeletal practitioners: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths, and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low Back Pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) randomized trial

David W Evans, Alan C Breen, Tamar Pincus, Julius Sim, Martin Underwood, Steven Vogel, Nadine E Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a printed information package on the low back pain (LBP)-related beliefs and reported behavior of musculoskeletal practitioners (chiropractors, osteopaths, and musculoskeletal physiotherapists) across the United Kingdom.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A substantial proportion of musculoskeletal practitioners in United Kingdom does not follow current LBP guideline recommendations.

METHODS: In total, 1758 practitioners were randomly allocated to either of the 2 study arms. One arm was posted a printed information package containing guideline recommendations for the management of LBP (n = 876) and the other received no intervention (n = 882). The primary outcome measure consisted of 3 "quality indicators" (activity, work, and bed-rest) relating to a vignette of a patient with LBP, in which responses were dichotomized into either "guideline-inconsistent" or "guideline-consistent." The secondary outcome was the practitioners' LBP-related beliefs, measured using the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale. Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 6 months.

RESULTS: Follow-up at 6 months was 89%. The changes in reported behavior on the quality indicators were as follows: activity, odds ratio (OR) 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.61) and number needed to be treated (NNT), 19 (15-28); work, OR 1.35 (1.07-1.70) and NNT 19 (14-29); and bed-rest, OR 1.31 (0.97-1.76) and NNT 47 (33-103). The composite NNT for a change from guideline-inconsistent to guideline-consistent behavior on at least 1 of the 3 quality indicators was 10 (9-14). LBP-related beliefs were significantly improved in those who were sent the information package (P = 0.002), but only to a small degree (mean difference, 0.884 scale points; 95% confidence interval, 0.319-1.448).

CONCLUSION: Printed educational material can shift LBP-related beliefs and reported behaviors of musculoskeletal practitioners, toward practice that is more in line with guideline recommendations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)858-66
Number of pages9
JournalSpine
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Attitude to Health
  • Behavior
  • Chiropractic
  • Culture
  • Data Collection
  • Education, Medical, Continuing
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Low Back Pain
  • Osteopathic Physicians
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Physical Therapy Specialty
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of a posted information package on the beliefs and behavior of musculoskeletal practitioners: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths, and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low Back Pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this