Abstract
Drawing from contractualist moral philosophy, this article argues in favour of extensive liability in negligence for persons associated with a corporation in connection with harms for which the corporation itself is primarily liable. These persons include not only parent companies but also natural persons who are controlling shareholders, the directors of liable companies and independent companies in the supply chain of the company that causes the harm. Doctrinal legal analysis is complemented by critically interrogating the case law from the perspective of Scanlon's contractualist theory of morality, which is utilised to build a compelling case for law reform. The article advocates holding broader classes of third parties liable to the extent that they, in fact, exercise control of the relevant activities of the primarily liable company. This would require courts to adopt broad interpretations of the established legal concepts of ‘creating a source of danger' and ‘assumption of responsibility’.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Journal of Corporate Law Studies |
| Early online date | 4 Feb 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 4 Feb 2026 |
Keywords
- Parent companies’ duty of care
- contractualist moral philosophy
- assumption of responsibility
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The duty to prevent corporate harms: a normative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver