Abstract
Donor governments face a dilemma when providing development aid to states that violate human rights. While aid may contribute to positive development outcomes, it may also contribute to rights violations committed by these regimes. This article provides a conceptual framework for donors to address this dilemma in a normatively justified way. Drawing on recent methodological advancements in normative political theory, we develop a distinctively political framework of dilemmas, suggesting three models: complicity, double effect and dirty hands. We consider this framework in the context of development aid, discussing the relevant considerations for donors in different cases. We demonstrate that an approach to development assistance that acknowledges political realities does not have to be normatively silent.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1431-1452 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | British Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 29 Sept 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- international development
- political dilemmas
- political theory
- Human Rights
- Aid
- donors
- authoritarianism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The donor's dilemma: international aid and human rights violations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver