The determination of the best interests in relation to childhood immunisation

Angus Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)


There are many different ethical arguments that might be advanced for and against childhood vaccinations. In this paper I explore one particular argument that focuses on the idea that such vaccinations are justifiable because they are held to be in the best interests of a particular child. Two issues arise from this idea. The first issue is how best interests are to be determined in this case. The second issue is what follows from this to justify potential interventions within the family in relation to such vaccinations. I argue that best interests must be characterised objectively in such situations and that this means that, in at least some cases, parental decision-making about vaccinating their children may be overridden.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-89
Number of pages18
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2005


Dive into the research topics of 'The determination of the best interests in relation to childhood immunisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this