Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Methodological Constraints: Autoethnographic and Prefigurative Responses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While sets of constraints have become normalised in research production, the COVID-19 pandemic mandated shifts in research ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies. The society-wide, real-time experiment of the pandemic lockdowns constructed a set of prefigurative counterfactual contexts in which alternative structures and processes came to be, albeit briefly, normalised. Two examples illustrate the risks and opportunities that emerged. Firstly, the turn to autoethnography and creative methods offers a methodological challenge to the minoritisation of certain voices within the academy. Secondly, and more substantively, pivots in response to lockdowns offered glimpses of labour market inclusion best practice through the prefiguration of alternative workplace norms, suggesting the potential value of prefigurative counterfactuals as research method. Nevertheless, both methodological and substantive insights explored here in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic were mediated by technology which has the potential to reproduce embedded dominant epistemologies and ontologies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-160
Number of pages16
JournalPossibility Studies and Society
Volume3
Issue number1
Early online date28 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Autoethnography
  • constraints
  • disability
  • methodology
  • technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The COVID-19 Pandemic and Methodological Constraints: Autoethnographic and Prefigurative Responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this