Abstract
In 1976 Julian Jaynes published his controversial book The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, introducing the hypothesis of a two-chambered brain-mind model that preceded the evolutionary development of the conscious mind. Jaynes' speculative model gave rise to a huge debate, which has reverberated throughout the current neuroscientific and neurophilosophical literature. Has the bicameral mind stood the test of time? To answer this question, the present paper adopts a multidisciplinary perspective and, after briefly summarizing Jaynes' hypothesis, addresses two main critical issues: the neurological basis of the bicameral model and the philological accuracy of Jaynes' arguments. Finally, the concept of a non-unitary Self is presented as one of the most relevant contemporary legacies of the bicameral mind.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-15 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Functional neurology |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2007 |
Keywords
- bicameral mind
- qualia
- consciousness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The "bicameral mind" 30 years on: a critical reappraisal of Julian Jaynes' hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver