Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population

Hareth Al-Janabi, Terry N. Flynn, Tim J. Peters, Stirling Bryan, Joanna Coast

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)
    120 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Although philosophically attractive, it may be difficult, in practice, to measure individuals' capabilities (what they are able to do in their lives) as opposed to their functionings (what they actually do). To examine whether capability information could be reliably self-reported, we administered a measure of self-reported capability (the Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure for Adults, ICECAP-A) on two occasions, 2 weeks apart, alongside a self-reported health measure (the EuroQol Five Dimensional Questionnaire with 3 levels, EQ-5D-3L). We found that respondents were able to report capabilities with a moderate level of consistency, although somewhat less reliably than their health status. The more socially orientated nature of some of the capability questions may account for the difference.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)625–630
    JournalHealth Economics
    Volume24
    Issue number5
    Early online date9 Sep 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2015

    Keywords

    • capability approach
    • outcomes
    • psychometrics
    • ICECAP
    • EQ-5D

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this