Abstract
In May 2016, as attacks on health care in armed conflicts were increasing globally, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 2286, demanding warring parties comply with their international obligations to prevent and address such attacks. The resolution was adopted unanimously by the Council and cosponsored by eightyfive UN member states. New data collection and public attention on attacks against health care at the time signaled that, contrary to scholarly expectation, the Council might use tools already at its disposal to ensure compliance with the resolution. Yet in the years that followed, the Security Council and states took few concrete steps to implement Resolution 2286. In this essay, we identify and analyze barriers that prevented the use of existing structures and mechanisms to influence the conduct of war. We contend that the experience of Resolution 2286 can tell us a great deal about the value of such resolutions as a response to pressing issues of humanitarian concern.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 142-156 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Daedalus |
| Volume | 152 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Political Science and International Relations
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Talk Is Cheap: Security Council Resolution 2286 & the Protection of Health Care in Armed Conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver