Structural reliability of conjoint measurement in health care: am empirical investigation

Stirling Bryan, D Parry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    25 Citations (Scopus)


    This paper is concerned with the structural reliability of conjoint measurement when applied in a health care setting. The clinical context was the diagnosis and treatment of knee injuries. A conjoint measurement study was conducted which used the pair-wise choice approach to preference elicitation. Each choice included two scenarios: a conventional treatment approach to management (arthroscopy) and an approach using magnetic resonance imaging. In order to test for structural reliability two separate conjoint measurement exercises were conducted: exercise A where scenarios were defined in terms of three attributes and exercise B where scenarios included all four attributes. The assessment of structural reliability involved a comparison of two random effects probit models, for exercises A and B. Data were collected on a total of 176 students of sports science. The results strongly indicate that the models for the two exercises are different, although the instability is limited to the constant term and a single model attribute (i.e. the avoidance of surgery). The finding of instability in the constant coefficient raises important questions about the appropriateness of labelling scenarios in conjoint measurement exercises.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)561-567
    Number of pages7
    JournalApplied Economics
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2002


    Dive into the research topics of 'Structural reliability of conjoint measurement in health care: am empirical investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this