Strategies for optimising early detection and obstetric first response management of postpartum haemorrhage at caesarean birth: a modified Delphi-based international expert consensus

Verónica Pingray*, Caitlin R Williams, Fadhlun M Alwy Al-beity, Edgardo Abalos, Sabaratnam Arulkumaran, Alejandro Blumenfeld, Brendan Carvalho, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Soo Downe, Alexandre Dumont, Maria Fernanda Escobar, Cherrie Evans, Sue Fawcus, Hadiza S Galadanci, Diem-Tuyet Thi Hoang, G Justus Hofmeyr, Caroline Homer, Ayodele G Lewis, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Pisake LumbiganonElliott K Main, Judith Maua, Francis G Muriithi, Ashraf Fawzy Nabhan, Inês Nunes, Vanesa Ortega, Thuan N Q Phan, Zahida P Qureshi, Claudio Sosa, John Varallo, Andrew D Weeks, Mariana Widmer, Olufemi T Oladapo, Ioannis Gallos, Arri Coomarasamy, Suellen Miller, Fernando Althabe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: There are no globally agreed on strategies on early detection and first response management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) during and after caesarean birth. Our study aimed to develop an international expert’s consensus on evidence-based approaches for early detection and obstetric first response management of PPH intraoperatively and postoperatively in caesarean birth.
Design: Systematic review and three-stage modified Delphi expert consensus.
Setting: International.
Population: Panel of 22 global experts in PPH with diverse backgrounds, and gender, professional and geographic balance.
Outcome measures: Agreement or disagreement on strategies for early detection and first response management of PPH at caesarean birth.
Results: Experts agreed that the same PPH definition should apply to both vaginal and caesarean birth. For the intraoperative phase, the experts agreed that early detection should be accomplished via quantitative blood loss measurement, complemented by monitoring the woman’s haemodynamic status; and that first response should be triggered once the woman loses at least 500 mL of blood with continued bleeding or when she exhibits clinical signs of haemodynamic instability, whichever occurs first. For the first response, experts agreed on immediate administration of uterotonics and tranexamic acid, examination to determine aetiology and rapid initiation of cause-specific responses. In the postoperative phase, the experts agreed that caesarean birth-related PPH should be detected primarily via frequently monitoring the woman’s haemodynamic status and clinical signs and symptoms of internal bleeding, supplemented by cumulative blood loss assessment performed quantitatively or by visual estimation. Postoperative first response was determined to require an individualised approach.
Conclusion: These agreed on proposed approaches could help improve the detection of PPH in the intraoperative and postoperative phases of caesarean birth and the first response management of intraoperative PPH. Determining how best to implement these strategies is a critical next step.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere079713
Number of pages12
JournalBMJ open
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2024

Keywords

  • obstetrics
  • maternal medicine
  • clinical decision-making
  • systematic review
  • postpartum period

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies for optimising early detection and obstetric first response management of postpartum haemorrhage at caesarean birth: a modified Delphi-based international expert consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this