Abstract
Information Processing Pathway Maps (IPPMs) are a concise way to represent the evidence for the transformation of information as it travels around the brain. However, their construction currently relies on hand-drawn maps from electrophysical recordings such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). This is both inefficient and contains an element of subjectivity. A better approach would be to automatically generate IPPMs from the data and objectively evaluate their accuracy. In this work, we propose a range of possible strategies and compare them to select the best. To this end, we (a) provide a test dataset against which automatic IPPM creation procedures can be evaluated; (b) suggest two novel evaluation metrics—causality violation and transform recall—from which these proposed procedures can be evaluated; (c) conduct a simulation study to evaluate how well ground-truth IPPMs can be recovered using the automatic procedure; and (d) propose and evaluate a selection of different IPPM creation procedures. Our results suggest that the max pooling approach gives the best results on these metrics. We conclude with a discussion of the limitations of this framework, and possible future directions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Neuroimaging |
| Volume | 4 |
| Early online date | 25 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 25 Nov 2025 |
Keywords
- motion processing
- electroencaphlography
- information processing pathway maps
- magnetoencepalography
- auditory processing