Stellar dating using chemical clocks and Bayesian inference

A. Moya, L. M. Sarro, E. Delgado-Mena, W. J. Chaplin, V. Adibekyan, S. Blanco-Cuaresma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Context. Dating stars is a major challenge with a deep impact on many astrophysical fields. One of the most promising techniques for this is using chemical abundances. Recent space- and ground-based facilities have improved the quantity of stars with accurate observations. This has opened the door for using Bayesian inference tools to maximise the information we can extract from them.

Aims. Our aim is to present accurate and reliable stellar age estimates of FGK stars using chemical abundances and stellar parameters.

Methods. We used one of the most flexible Bayesian inference techniques (hierarchical Bayesian models) to exceed current possibilities in the use of chemical abundances for stellar dating. Our model is a data-driven model. We used a training set that has been presented in the literature with ages estimated with isochrones and accurate stellar abundances and general characteristics. The core of the model is a prescription of certain abundance ratios as linear combinations of stellar properties including age. We gathered four different testing sets to assess the accuracy, precision, and limits of our model. We also trained a model using chemical abundances alone.

Results. We found that our age estimates and those coming from asteroseismology, other accurate sources, and also with ten Gaia benchmark stars agree well. The mean absolute difference of our estimates compared with those used as reference is 0.9 Ga, with a mean difference of 0.01 Ga. When using open clusters, we reached a very good agreement for Hyades, NGC 2632, Ruprecht 147, and IC 4651. We also found outliers that are a reflection of chemical peculiarities and/or stars at the limit of the validity ranges of the training set. The model that only uses chemical abundances shows slightly worse mean absolute difference (1.18 Ga) and mean difference (−0.12 Ga).
Original languageEnglish
Article numberA15
Number of pages14
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics
Volume660
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements. The authors want to thank an anonymous referee for his/her very interesting and constructive comments. The paper was clearly improved thanks to them. We also want to thank editor M. Salaris for his understanding during the refereeing procedure. A.M. acknowledges funding support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 749962 (project THOT), from Grant PID2019-107061GB-C65 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and from Generalitat Valenciana in the frame of the GenT Project CIDEGENT/2020/036. V.A. and E.D.M. were supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through national funds and by FEDER through COMPETE2020 – Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização by these grants: UID/FIS/04434/2019; UIDB/04434/2020; UIDP/04434/2020; PTDC/FIS-AST/32113/2017 and POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032113; PTDC/FIS-AST/28953/2017 and POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028953. V.A. and E.D.M. also acknowledge the support from FCT through Investigador FCT contracts nr. IF/00650/2015/CP1273/CT0001 and IF/00849/2015/CP1273/CT0003, and POPH/FSE (EC) by FEDER funding through the program “Programa Operacional de Factores de Competitividade – COMPETE”.

Publisher Copyright:
© ESO 2022.

Keywords

  • Astrochemistry
  • Methods: data analysis
  • Methods: statistical
  • Stars: abundances
  • Stars: evolution
  • Stars: fundamental parameters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stellar dating using chemical clocks and Bayesian inference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this