Standard target calibration: practical inter-comparison with planar surface targets and calibrated transducers

P. R. Atkins, T. Yan, F. Hayati

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

168 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This contribution presents the inter-comparison of three different methods for obtaining amplitude and phase correction functions for broadband transducers used within an experimental scientific echo sounder. The standard target method is compared to the use of a planar boundary and a conventional calibrated PVDF membrane hydrophone. These correction functions enabled a fully corrected scientific active sonar system to be deployed for measuring the statistical repeatability of a production run of standard target spheres using low cost materials such as aluminum. Previous experience had shown that the acoustic characteristics of aluminum stock differed from billet-to-billet and even within a billet. Thus a laboratory method of establishing the efficacy of low-cost standard targets was developed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-5090-5278-3, 978-1-5386-2111-0 (DVD)
ISBN (Print) 978-1-5090-5279-0 (PoD)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Oct 2017
EventOCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen - Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Duration: 19 Jun 201722 Jun 2017

Publication series

NameOCEANS - Europe
Volume2017-October

Conference

ConferenceOCEANS 2017 - Aberdeen
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityAberdeen
Period19/06/1722/06/17

Keywords

  • active sonar calibration
  • standard target

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Instrumentation
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Oceanography
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Automotive Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standard target calibration: practical inter-comparison with planar surface targets and calibrated transducers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this