Staff strategies and explanations for intervening with challenging behaviours: A replication in a community sample

M. J. Watts, T. S. Reed, R. P. Hastings*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Carers' beliefs about challenging behaviours may partially determine their behavioural responses to them. The present study replicated previous work on the beliefs of institution staff and their explanations about interventions for challenging behaviours with a sample of 56 community staff. Many immediate intervention strategies, and the staff motivation for these choices, were in conflict with behavioural approaches to challenging behaviour and would be considered counter-habilitative from this perspective. Staff were able to describe appropriate longer-term interventions. These basic findings confirmed those of previous research with institution staff. However, tentative comparisons suggested that community staff were more likely than institution staff (from previous research) to describe interventions involving the building of relationships with service users and the identification of the underlying causes of the behaviours.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)258-263
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1997

Keywords

  • Challenging behaviours
  • Community sample
  • Intervention
  • Staff strategies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Staff strategies and explanations for intervening with challenging behaviours: A replication in a community sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this