Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors

Rodney Taylor; JP Buyten; E Buchser

doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004

Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors

Rodney Taylor, JP Buyten, E Buchser

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

188 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and identify the potential predictors of SCS outcome. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature and meta-regression. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for controlled and uncontrolled studies and economic evaluations relating to the use of SCS in patients with either CRPS type I or II. RESULTS: One randomised controlled trial, 25 case series and one cost-effectiveness study were included. In the randomised controlled trial in type I CRPS patients, SCS therapy lead to a reduction in pain intensity at 24 months of follow-up (mean change in VAS score -2.0), whereas pain was unchanged in the control group (mean change in VAS score 0.0) (p

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	91-101
Number of pages	11
Journal	European Journal of Pain
Volume	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004
Publication status	Published - 1 Feb 2006

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004

Cite this

@article{bc3d69b851f847c19cd68661d1a8d83b,

title = "Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and identify the potential predictors of SCS outcome. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature and meta-regression. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for controlled and uncontrolled studies and economic evaluations relating to the use of SCS in patients with either CRPS type I or II. RESULTS: One randomised controlled trial, 25 case series and one cost-effectiveness study were included. In the randomised controlled trial in type I CRPS patients, SCS therapy lead to a reduction in pain intensity at 24 months of follow-up (mean change in VAS score -2.0), whereas pain was unchanged in the control group (mean change in VAS score 0.0) (p",

author = "Rodney Taylor and JP Buyten and E Buchser",

year = "2006",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "91--101",

journal = "European Journal of Pain",

publisher = "Wiley",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors

AU - Taylor, Rodney

AU - Buyten, JP

AU - Buchser, E

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and identify the potential predictors of SCS outcome. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature and meta-regression. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for controlled and uncontrolled studies and economic evaluations relating to the use of SCS in patients with either CRPS type I or II. RESULTS: One randomised controlled trial, 25 case series and one cost-effectiveness study were included. In the randomised controlled trial in type I CRPS patients, SCS therapy lead to a reduction in pain intensity at 24 months of follow-up (mean change in VAS score -2.0), whereas pain was unchanged in the control group (mean change in VAS score 0.0) (p

AB - OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and identify the potential predictors of SCS outcome. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature and meta-regression. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for controlled and uncontrolled studies and economic evaluations relating to the use of SCS in patients with either CRPS type I or II. RESULTS: One randomised controlled trial, 25 case series and one cost-effectiveness study were included. In the randomised controlled trial in type I CRPS patients, SCS therapy lead to a reduction in pain intensity at 24 months of follow-up (mean change in VAS score -2.0), whereas pain was unchanged in the control group (mean change in VAS score 0.0) (p

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/28444470551

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 16310712

VL - 10

SP - 91

EP - 101

JO - European Journal of Pain

JF - European Journal of Pain

ER -

Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this