Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production. Evidence from the production of homophones in Dutch and German

JD Jescheniak, Antje Meyer, WJM Levelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A. Caramazza, A. Costa, M. Miozzo, and Y. Bi (2001) reported a series of experiments demonstrating that the ease of producing a word depends only on the frequency of that specific word but not on the frequency of a homophone twin. A. Caramazza, A. Costa, et al. concluded that homophones have separate word form representations and that the absence of frequency-inheritance effects for homophones undermines an important argument in support of 2-stage models of lexical access, which assume that syntactic (lemma) representations mediate between conceptual and phonological representations. The authors of this article evaluate the empirical basis of this conclusion, report 2 experiments demonstrating a frequency-inheritance effect, and discuss other recent evidence. It is concluded that homophones share a common word form and that the distinction between lemmas and word forms should be upheld.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)432-438
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production. Evidence from the production of homophones in Dutch and German'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this