Speakers’ gestures predict the meaning and perception of iconicity in signs

Gerardo Ortega, Annika Schiefner, Asli Ozyurek

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sign languages stand out in that there is high prevalence of conventionalised linguistic forms that map directly to their referent (i.e., iconic). Hearing adults show low performance when asked to guess the meaning of iconic signs suggesting that their iconic features are largely inaccessible to them. However, it has not been investigated whether speakers’ gestures, which also share the property of iconicity, may assist non-signers in guessing the meaning of signs. Results from a pantomime generation task (Study 1) show that speakers’ gestures exhibit a high degree of systematicity, and share different degrees of form overlap with signs (full, partial, and no overlap). Study 2 shows that signs with full and partial overlap are more accurately guessed and are assigned higher iconicity ratings than signs with no overlap. Deaf and hearing adults converge in their iconic depictions for some concepts due to the shared conceptual knowledge and manual-visual modality
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
EditorsG. Gunzelmann, A. Howe, T. Tenbrink
Place of PublicationTexas
PublisherCognitive Science Society
Pages889-894
Number of pages6
VolumeAustin
ISBN (Electronic)9780991196760
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 26 Jul 201729 Jul 2017

Conference

Conference39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
Abbreviated titleCogSci 2017
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period26/07/1729/07/17

Keywords

  • sign language
  • second language acquisition
  • Iconicity in language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Speakers’ gestures predict the meaning and perception of iconicity in signs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this