TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial and temporal variation in river corridor exchange across a 5th-order mountain stream network
AU - Ward, Adam S.
AU - Wondzell, Steven M.
AU - Schmadel, Noah M.
AU - Herzog, Skuyler
AU - Zarnetske, Jay P.
AU - Baranov, Viktor
AU - Blaen, Phillip J.
AU - Brekenfeld, Nicolai
AU - Chu, Rosalie
AU - Derelle, Romain
AU - Drummond, Jennifer
AU - Fleckenstein, Jan H.
AU - Garayburu-Caruso, Vanessa
AU - Graham, Emily
AU - Hannah, David
AU - Harman, Ciaran J.
AU - Hixson, Jase
AU - Knapp, Julia L.A.
AU - Krause, Stefan
AU - Kurz, Marie J.
AU - Lewandowski, Jörg
AU - Li, Angang
AU - Martí, Eugènia
AU - Miller, Melinda
AU - Milner, Alexander M.
AU - Neil, Kerry
AU - Orsini, Luisa
AU - Packman, Aaron I.
AU - Plont, Stephen
AU - Renteria, Lupita
AU - Roche, Kevin
AU - Royer, Todd
AU - Segura, Catalina
AU - Stegen, James
AU - Toyoda, Jason
AU - Wells, Jacqueline
AU - Wisnoski, Nathan I.
PY - 2019/12/20
Y1 - 2019/12/20
N2 - Although most field and modeling studies of river corridor exchange have been conducted at scales ranging from tens to hundreds of meters, results of these studies are used to predict their ecological and hydrological influences at the scale of river networks. Further complicating prediction, exchanges are expected to vary with hydrologic forcing and the local geomorphic setting. While we desire predictive power, we lack a complete spatiotemporal relationship relating discharge to the variation in geologic setting and hydrologic forcing that is expected across a river basin. Indeed, the conceptual model ofWondzell (2011) predicts systematic variation in river corridor exchange as a function of (1) variation in baseflow over time at a fixed location, (2) variation in discharge with location in the river network, and (3) local geomorphic setting. To test this conceptual model we conducted more than 60 solute tracer studies including a synoptic campaign in the 5th-order river network of the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest (Oregon, USA) and replicate-intime experiments in four watersheds. We interpret the data using a series of metrics describing river corridor exchange and solute transport, testing for consistent direction and magnitude of relationships relating these metrics to discharge and local geomorphic setting. We confirmed systematic decrease in river corridor exchange space through the river networks, from headwaters to the larger main stem. However, we did not find systematic variation with changes in discharge through time or with local geomorphic setting. While interpretation of our results is complicated by problems with the analytical methods, the results are sufficiently robust for us to conclude that space-for-time and time-for-space substitutions are not appropriate in our study system. Finally, we suggest two strategies that will improve the interpretability of tracer test results and help the hyporheic community develop robust datasets that will enable comparisons across multiple sites and/or discharge conditions.
AB - Although most field and modeling studies of river corridor exchange have been conducted at scales ranging from tens to hundreds of meters, results of these studies are used to predict their ecological and hydrological influences at the scale of river networks. Further complicating prediction, exchanges are expected to vary with hydrologic forcing and the local geomorphic setting. While we desire predictive power, we lack a complete spatiotemporal relationship relating discharge to the variation in geologic setting and hydrologic forcing that is expected across a river basin. Indeed, the conceptual model ofWondzell (2011) predicts systematic variation in river corridor exchange as a function of (1) variation in baseflow over time at a fixed location, (2) variation in discharge with location in the river network, and (3) local geomorphic setting. To test this conceptual model we conducted more than 60 solute tracer studies including a synoptic campaign in the 5th-order river network of the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest (Oregon, USA) and replicate-intime experiments in four watersheds. We interpret the data using a series of metrics describing river corridor exchange and solute transport, testing for consistent direction and magnitude of relationships relating these metrics to discharge and local geomorphic setting. We confirmed systematic decrease in river corridor exchange space through the river networks, from headwaters to the larger main stem. However, we did not find systematic variation with changes in discharge through time or with local geomorphic setting. While interpretation of our results is complicated by problems with the analytical methods, the results are sufficiently robust for us to conclude that space-for-time and time-for-space substitutions are not appropriate in our study system. Finally, we suggest two strategies that will improve the interpretability of tracer test results and help the hyporheic community develop robust datasets that will enable comparisons across multiple sites and/or discharge conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073869674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019
DO - 10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073869674
SN - 1027-5606
VL - 23
SP - 5199
EP - 5225
JO - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
JF - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
IS - 12
ER -