Abstract
BACKGROUND: The opening solicitation is a key element of the primary care consultation as it enables patients to express their ideas, concerns and expectations that can lead to improved patient outcomes. However, in practice, this may not always occur. With nurses and pharmacists now able to prescribe, this research explored the opening solicitation in a multi-professional context.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the nature, frequency and response to opening solicitations used in consultations with nurse prescribers (NPs), pharmacist prescribers (PPs) and GPs.
METHODS: An observational study using audio-recordings of NP, PP and GP patient consultations in 36 primary care practices in southern England. Between 7-13 prescriber-patient consultations were recorded per prescriber. A standardized pro forma based upon previous research was used to assess recordings.
RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-three patient consultations (213 GPs, 209 NPs, 111 PPs) were audio-recorded with 51 prescribers. Across the prescribing groups, pharmacists asked fewer opening solicitations, while GPs used more open questions than NPs and PPs. The mean number of patient agenda items was 1.3 with more items in GP consultations. Patients completed their opening agenda in 20% of consultations, which was unaffected by professional seen. Redirection of the patient's agenda occurred at 24 seconds (mean).
CONCLUSION: All prescribers should be encouraged to use more open questions and ask multiple solicitations throughout the consultation. This is likely to result in greater expression of patients' concerns and improved patient outcomes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 712-8 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Family Practice |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2013 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Drug Prescriptions
- England
- Female
- General Practitioners
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Nurses
- Pharmacists
- Primary Health Care
- Referral and Consultation
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Journal Article
- Observational Study
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't