Social science in a stem cell laboratory: What happened when social and life sciences met

Glyn Stacey, Neil Stephens*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe the experience of conducting intensive social science research at the UK Stem Cell Bank from the viewpoint of both the person conducting the social science research and the Director of the Bank. We detail the initial misunderstandings and concerns held by both and the problems these caused. Then we describe how the relationship developed as the project progressed and shared benefits became apparent. Finally, while acknowledging potential areas of tension between the life and social sciences, we suggest further interaction between the disciplines would prove beneficial for both and speculate as to how this may be achieved. In the discussion we identify a set of learning points from our experience and definitions of social science terminology that may help to inform future engagements between life and social scientists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-126
Number of pages10
JournalRegenerative Medicine
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • ethics
  • interdisciplinary research
  • regulation
  • social science
  • UK Stem Cell Bank

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Embryology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social science in a stem cell laboratory: What happened when social and life sciences met'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this