Abstract
In this paper, we report on two experimental studies that examine the impact of social distance on delegation and uncover the role of anonymity driving delegation in a principal‐agent setting. Study 1 shows that reducing the social distance makes principals less likely to delegate. Study 2 offers evidence that the likelihood of delegation is not affected by whether the principal is informed that the recipients will not find out whether the principal is their friend or a stranger. Our findings have implications for the underlying sources of pro‐sociality in organizational settings where managers make their decisions through hiring external agents.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Economic Inquiry |
| Early online date | 24 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 24 Nov 2025 |
Keywords
- social distance
- principal‐agent setting
- delegation
- laboratory experiments
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social distance and delegation: Does anonymity matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver