So you’re literally taking the piss?! Critically analysing and accounting for ethics (and risk) in interdisciplinary research on children and plastics

Peter Kraftl; Iseult Lynch; Polly Jarman; Alice Menzel; Amy Walker; Ruth Till; Sophie Hadfield-Hill

doi:10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124

So you’re literally taking the piss?! Critically analysing and accounting for ethics (and risk) in interdisciplinary research on children and plastics

Peter Kraftl, Iseult Lynch, Polly Jarman, Alice Menzel, Amy Walker, Ruth Till, Sophie Hadfield-Hill

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

247 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Whilst interdisciplinarity has been an integral part of childhood studies, it is less common for social scientists and natural scientists to collaborate in this space – and especially with scholars like environmental (nano)scientists. This paper draws on vignettes from a project about children and plastics, which combined a range of qualitative, artistic and biosampling methods. Focusing on these methodological intersections, the paper critically reflects on a range of ethical issues, including institutional ethical approval, health and risk assessments, informed consent, and data analysis. Its principal contribution is to outline significant ethical issues rarely (if ever) considered by childhood studies scholars, anticipating that doing so might support others (including those beyond childhood studies) wishing to engage in similar kinds of interdisciplinary research, especially in response to complex, pressing, socio-environmental challenges facing children. The paper’s second contribution is to offer a more systematic set of ethical considerations for burgeoning new-materialist, posthuman and post-qualitative approaches to childhood studies.

Original language	English
Journal	Children's Geographies
Early online date	18 Jan 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124 https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 18 Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The research on which this paper is based was funded by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship (grant reference 2018–211; title ‘Plastic Childhoods’), awarded to Peter Kraftl. Peter and the other authors would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for their financial support for the project. They would also like to thank the school, and particularly the students who took part so enthusiastically in the research, as well as the environmental scientists and colleagues within the ethics and health & safety committees who contributed to the development of the research and its protocols.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Interdisciplinary research ethics
environmental science
health and safety
new materialist and posthumanist childhood studies
qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
Geography, Planning and Development
Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

KraflP2021SoyourAccepted author manuscript, 233 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)

Cite this

Kraftl, P., Lynch, I., Jarman, P., Menzel, A., Walker, A., Till, R., & Hadfield-Hill, S. (2021). So you’re literally taking the piss?! Critically analysing and accounting for ethics (and risk) in interdisciplinary research on children and plastics. Children's Geographies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124, https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124

@article{683e2f2c5cd841c3821151c5f6a7eb40,

title = "So you{\textquoteright}re literally taking the piss?! Critically analysing and accounting for ethics (and risk) in interdisciplinary research on children and plastics",

abstract = "Whilst interdisciplinarity has been an integral part of childhood studies, it is less common for social scientists and natural scientists to collaborate in this space – and especially with scholars like environmental (nano)scientists. This paper draws on vignettes from a project about children and plastics, which combined a range of qualitative, artistic and biosampling methods. Focusing on these methodological intersections, the paper critically reflects on a range of ethical issues, including institutional ethical approval, health and risk assessments, informed consent, and data analysis. Its principal contribution is to outline significant ethical issues rarely (if ever) considered by childhood studies scholars, anticipating that doing so might support others (including those beyond childhood studies) wishing to engage in similar kinds of interdisciplinary research, especially in response to complex, pressing, socio-environmental challenges facing children. The paper{\textquoteright}s second contribution is to offer a more systematic set of ethical considerations for burgeoning new-materialist, posthuman and post-qualitative approaches to childhood studies.",

keywords = "Interdisciplinary research ethics, environmental science, health and safety, new materialist and posthumanist childhood studies, qualitative methods",

author = "Peter Kraftl and Iseult Lynch and Polly Jarman and Alice Menzel and Amy Walker and Ruth Till and Sophie Hadfield-Hill",

note = "Funding Information: The research on which this paper is based was funded by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship (grant reference 2018–211; title {\textquoteleft}Plastic Childhoods{\textquoteright}), awarded to Peter Kraftl. Peter and the other authors would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for their financial support for the project. They would also like to thank the school, and particularly the students who took part so enthusiastically in the research, as well as the environmental scientists and colleagues within the ethics and health & safety committees who contributed to the development of the research and its protocols. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124",

language = "English",

journal = "Children's Geographies",

issn = "1473-3285",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - So you’re literally taking the piss?! Critically analysing and accounting for ethics (and risk) in interdisciplinary research on children and plastics

AU - Kraftl, Peter

AU - Lynch, Iseult

AU - Jarman, Polly

AU - Menzel, Alice

AU - Walker, Amy

AU - Till, Ruth

AU - Hadfield-Hill, Sophie

N1 - Funding Information: The research on which this paper is based was funded by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship (grant reference 2018–211; title ‘Plastic Childhoods’), awarded to Peter Kraftl. Peter and the other authors would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for their financial support for the project. They would also like to thank the school, and particularly the students who took part so enthusiastically in the research, as well as the environmental scientists and colleagues within the ethics and health & safety committees who contributed to the development of the research and its protocols. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2021/1/18

Y1 - 2021/1/18

N2 - Whilst interdisciplinarity has been an integral part of childhood studies, it is less common for social scientists and natural scientists to collaborate in this space – and especially with scholars like environmental (nano)scientists. This paper draws on vignettes from a project about children and plastics, which combined a range of qualitative, artistic and biosampling methods. Focusing on these methodological intersections, the paper critically reflects on a range of ethical issues, including institutional ethical approval, health and risk assessments, informed consent, and data analysis. Its principal contribution is to outline significant ethical issues rarely (if ever) considered by childhood studies scholars, anticipating that doing so might support others (including those beyond childhood studies) wishing to engage in similar kinds of interdisciplinary research, especially in response to complex, pressing, socio-environmental challenges facing children. The paper’s second contribution is to offer a more systematic set of ethical considerations for burgeoning new-materialist, posthuman and post-qualitative approaches to childhood studies.

AB - Whilst interdisciplinarity has been an integral part of childhood studies, it is less common for social scientists and natural scientists to collaborate in this space – and especially with scholars like environmental (nano)scientists. This paper draws on vignettes from a project about children and plastics, which combined a range of qualitative, artistic and biosampling methods. Focusing on these methodological intersections, the paper critically reflects on a range of ethical issues, including institutional ethical approval, health and risk assessments, informed consent, and data analysis. Its principal contribution is to outline significant ethical issues rarely (if ever) considered by childhood studies scholars, anticipating that doing so might support others (including those beyond childhood studies) wishing to engage in similar kinds of interdisciplinary research, especially in response to complex, pressing, socio-environmental challenges facing children. The paper’s second contribution is to offer a more systematic set of ethical considerations for burgeoning new-materialist, posthuman and post-qualitative approaches to childhood studies.

KW - Interdisciplinary research ethics

KW - environmental science

KW - health and safety

KW - new materialist and posthumanist childhood studies

KW - qualitative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099603380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124

DO - 10.1080/14733285.2021.1875124

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85099603380

SN - 1473-3285

JO - Children's Geographies

JF - Children's Geographies

ER -

So you’re literally taking the piss?! Critically analysing and accounting for ethics (and risk) in interdisciplinary research on children and plastics

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this