Signal-mediated depolymerization of actin in pollen during the self-incompatibility response

BN Snowman, DR Kovar, Galina Shevchenko, Vernonica Franklin Tong, CJ Staiger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Signal perception and the integration of signals into networks that effect cellular changes is essential for all cells. The self-incompatibility (SI) response in field poppy pollen triggers a Ca(2+)-dependent signaling cascade that results in the inhibition of incompatible pollen. SI also stimulates dramatic alterations in the actin cytoskeleton. By measuring the amount of filamentous (F-) actin in pollen before and during the SI response, we demonstrate that SI stimulates a rapid and large reduction in F-actin level that is sustained for at least 1 h. This represents quantitative evidence for stimulus-mediated depolymerization of F-actin in plant cells by a defined biological stimulus. Surprisingly, there are remarkably few examples of sustained reductions in F-actin levels stimulated by a biologically relevant ligand. Actin depolymerization also was achieved in pollen by treatments that increase cytosolic free Ca(2+) artificially, providing evidence that actin is a target for the Ca(2+) signals triggered by the SI response. By determining the cellular concentrations and binding constants for native profilin from poppy pollen, we show that profilin has Ca(2+)-dependent monomeric actin-sequestering activity. Although profilin is likely to contribute to stimulus-mediated actin depolymerization, our data suggest a role for additional actin binding proteins. We propose that Ca(2+)-mediated depolymerization of F-actin may be a mechanism whereby SI-induced tip growth inhibition is achieved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2613-2626
Number of pages14
JournalThe Plant Cell
Volume14
Early online date16 Sept 2002
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Signal-mediated depolymerization of actin in pollen during the self-incompatibility response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this