Sex and discipline differences in empathising, systemising and autistic symptomatology: Evidence from a student population

Julia M. Carroll*, Kin Yung Chiew

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Baron-Cohen's [(2002) Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248-255] 'extreme male brain' theory of autism is investigated by examining the relationships between theory of mind, central coherence, empathising, systemising and autistic-like symptomatology in typical undergraduates. There were sex differences in the expected directions on all tasks. Differences according to discipline were found only in central coherence. There was no evidence of an association between empathising and systemising. In the second study, performance on the Mechanical Reasoning task was compared with Systemising quotient and the Social Skills Inventory was compared with the Empathising Quotient. Moderate, but not high correlations were found. Findings are broadly consistent with the distinction between empathising and systemising but cast some doubt on the tasks used to measure these abilities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)949-957
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
    Volume36
    Issue number7
    Early online date9 Aug 2006
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

    Keywords

    • Central coherence
    • Empathising
    • Extreme male brain
    • Gender
    • Systemising
    • Theory of mind

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Developmental and Educational Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sex and discipline differences in empathising, systemising and autistic symptomatology: Evidence from a student population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this