Abstract
This article comments on the recent Supreme Court decision in Miller v Alabama. In this case, the Court outlawed mandatory sentences of life without parole for offenders under the age of 18 who are convicted of murder. However, the Court upheld the constitutionality of discretionary sentences of LWOP for child offenders. This article argues that the Court's own reasoning compels it to conclude that such sentences are also unconstitutional at the next available opportunity
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 801-813 |
Journal | Human Rights Law Review |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 22 Dec 2012 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- international human rights law
- juvenile offenders
- sentencing
- life imprisonment
- parole
- US Supreme Court
- Miller v Alabama