Sentencing Children Who Kill: One giant leap for the US Supreme Court, one small step for international human rights law

Bharat Malkani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article comments on the recent Supreme Court decision in Miller v Alabama. In this case, the Court outlawed mandatory sentences of life without parole for offenders under the age of 18 who are convicted of murder. However, the Court upheld the constitutionality of discretionary sentences of LWOP for child offenders. This article argues that the Court's own reasoning compels it to conclude that such sentences are also unconstitutional at the next available opportunity
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)801-813
JournalHuman Rights Law Review
Volume12
Issue number4
Early online date22 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • international human rights law
  • juvenile offenders
  • sentencing
  • life imprisonment
  • parole
  • US Supreme Court
  • Miller v Alabama

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sentencing Children Who Kill: One giant leap for the US Supreme Court, one small step for international human rights law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this