Self-Regulation and Political Confabulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the nature and consequences of confabulation about political opinions and behaviours. When people confabulate, they give reasons for their choices or behaviour which are ill-grounded and do not capture what really brought the behaviour about, but they do this with no intention to deceive and endorse their own accounts. I suggest that this can happen when people are asked why they voted a certain way, or support certain campaigns, and so on. Confabulating in these political contexts seems bad because we do not get a fully truthful account of why some political choice was made, and so the reasoning behind the choice is under-scrutinised. However, I argue that if people have a virtue of self-regulation, confabulation in political contexts can actually be part of the process of coming to better understand our political choices and embody more consistently the political values which we ascribe to.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-128
JournalRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplements
Volume92
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Regulation and Political Confabulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this