Abstract
We compared the number of spatial frequency and orientation mechanisms underlying first- versus second-order processing by measuring discrimination at detection threshold for first- and second-order Gabors to determine the smallest difference in spatial frequency and orientation that permits accurate discrimination at threshold. For second-order gratings, the number of channels is the same as for first-order gratings for spatial frequencies up to about 2 cpd; however, there are fewer second-order channels at higher spatial frequencies. In contrast, the number of labeled channels for orientation is the same for first- and second-order gratings. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence for distinct spatial frequency and orientation labeled detectors in second-order visual processing. We also show that, relative to first-order, there are fewer second-order channels processing higher spatial frequencies. This is consistent with a filter-rectify-filter scheme for second-order in which the second stage of filtering is at lower spatial frequencies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2798-803 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Vision Research |
| Volume | 46 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2006 |
Keywords
- orientation
- spatial frequency
- second-order
- first-order
- visual discrimination
- channels
- detection threshold
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Second-order spatial frequency and orientation channels in human vision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver