Safety and efficacy of amiodarone and dronedarone for early rhythm control in EAST-AFNET 4

Laura Rottner*, Marc D. Lemoine, Lars Eckardt, Katrin Borof, A. John Camm, Andreas Goette, Günter Breithardt, Andreas Metzner, Ulrich Schotten, Antonia Zapf, Hein Heidbüchel, Stephan Willems, Harry Crijns, Renate B. Schnabel, Larissa Fabritz, Christina Magnussen, Andreas Rillig, Paulus Kirchhof

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: Concerns exist about the safety of amiodarone and dronedarone. We assessed the long-term outcome of both drugs for early rhythm control (ERC) in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. 

Methods and Results: Patients randomized for ERC and treated with amiodarone or dronedarone were compared to other ERC-therapies. Patients receiving amiodarone or dronedarone at initial therapy (n = 653/1395) were older with more comorbidities and less paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF, 29%) compared to patients never receiving amiodarone or dronedarone (Amiodarone/Dronedaronenever, 43% paroxysmal AF). Patients treated with amiodarone had more often heart failure (HF, 42%) and persistent AF (40%) compared to patients treated with dronedarone (16% HF, 15% persistent AF) and Amiodarone/Dronedaronenever (25% HF, 22% persistent AF). 115/398 amiodarone-treated patients (6.7/100 patient-years) and 51/255 dronedarone-treated patients (4.2/100 patient-years) experienced a primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke, HF-hospitalization or acute coronary syndrome), while 98/398 (5.3/100 patient-years) and 43/255 (3.4/100 patient-years) experienced a primary safety outcome (death, stroke or serious adverse events related to rhythm-control therapy). Serious adverse events related to drug therapy were similar for amiodarone (1.4/100 patient-years), dronedarone (1.2/100 patient-years), and other ERC (0.8/100 patient-years). Dronedarone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.5; CI 0.28–0.91), age (HR 1.05; CI 1.03–1.07), coronary artery disease (HR 1.84; CI 1.38–2.46) and stable HF (HR 1.66; CI 1.28–2.16) were associated with efficacy outcome upon multivariate Cox regression. Age (HR 1.07; CI 1.05–1.09) and left ventricular hypertrophy (HR 1.94; CI 1.13–3.32) were associated with safety outcome. 

Conclusion: Early rhythm control using amiodarone or dronedarone rarely led to drug-related serious adverse events in EAST-AFNET 4. 

Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere011585
Number of pages16
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
Early online date19 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • Amiodarone
  • Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Dronedarone
  • Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and efficacy of amiodarone and dronedarone for early rhythm control in EAST-AFNET 4'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this