Risks, benefits, opportunities, and electronic formalities in the law of wills: a comparative approach

Margaret Hall*, Tina Cockburn, Briget J. Crawford, Rosie Harding, Kelly Purser

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Traditional “formalities” in the law of wills (including formal requirements for revocation by destruction) contemplate paper documents, wet signatures, and testators and witnesses in the physical presence of one another. Unless these traditional requirements have been modified by legislation, wills made using one or more electronic versions of formalities will not meet the formal requirements for a valid will. Traditional wills formalities have become something of an outlier as the use of electronic text, records, signatures, and witnessing has become routine in many spheres (including the creation and storage of valid legal agreements). The special nature of wills, and their consequent vulnerability to fraud and reliance on documentary evidence of intent, has been cited as a justification for retaining traditional formalities. This article examines the risks, benefits, and opportunities associated with electronic formalities; the implications of their use for wills storage and the assessment of testamentary capacity and related issues; and the adequacy of dispensing provisions as an alternative to electronic formalities (e-formalities). The article includes contributions by co-authors in four common law jurisdictions (England and Wales; British Columbia; Queensland; and New York) with a discussion of how the risks, benefits and opportunities presented by e-formalities and electronic wills (e-wills) have been perceived and balanced within each of these jurisdictions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMcGill Law Journal
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 30 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Not yet published as of 12/09/2024.

Cite this