Risk-stratified sequential treatment with ibrutinib and rituximab (IR) and IR-CHOP for de-novo post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: results of the tidal trial

Sridhar Chaganti, Shanna Maycock, Graham Mcilroy, Waleed A Iqbal, John Mason, Edward Kanfer, Shireen Kassam, Kate Cwynarski, David Wrench, Arvind K. Arumainathan, Christopher P Fox, Rod Johnson, Pam Mckay, Shankara Paneesha, Clare J Rowntree, Constantine-george Balotis, Graham P. Collins, Andrew Davies, Josh Wright, Keith WheatleyTobias F Menne

Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

Abstract

Introduction: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a rare and life-threatening complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Most are of B-cell origin and treated with rituximab with or without chemotherapy. Patients achieving a complete response (CR) to rituximab have good outcomes and can avoid the excess toxicity of chemotherapy. The prospective PTLD-1 trial reported a CR rate of 25% with rituximab. We postulated adding ibrutinib to rituximab may increase CR rates, avoid chemotherapy for more patients and improve outcomes overall.

Methods: TIDaL is a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial evaluating the activity of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab (IR), with chemotherapy added using a risk-stratified sequential treatment strategy. Eligible patients had treatment naïve, CD20-positive PTLD of any histologic subtype arising after SOT. Patients required measurable disease and adequate organ function.

All patients received ibrutinib 560 mg daily with 4 doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Interim response to IR was assessed by CT scan between days 42-49. Risk stratification for subsequent therapy was based on baseline and interim CT response. Patients were assigned to the low risk arm if they achieved a CR on interim CT (irrespective of IPI) or a partial response (PR) with an IPI of 0-1. They continued with IR receiving 4 further 3-weekly doses of rituximab, ibrutinib continued until 3 weeks after the last dose of rituximab. All other patients were assigned to the high risk arm and received 4 cycles of R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone in 21-day cycles). Ibrutinib continued until 3 weeks after the last cycle of R-CHOP for all , . Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia was mandated, as was granulocyte colony stimulating factor for all high risk patients.

The primary outcome was CR assessed by interim CT. A CR rate of ≥40% was considered to be of interest, with an unacceptable CR rate set at ≤25%. Following a Simon's 2 stage design, 38 evaluable patients would need to be recruited, with at least 12 achieving CR to indicate further investigation is warranted. Secondary outcomes included allocation to the low risk arm, progression free survival (PFS), post-IR PFS (excluding disease progression events during initial IR treatment), overall survival (OS), and treatment tolerability.

Results: Between January 2017 and March 2020, 39 patients were recruited from 17 sites; 22 male, median age 59 years (range 23 to 76), 28% with IPI 3-5. Transplanted organs were kidney (n=20), liver (n=13), heart (n=4) and lung (n=2).

Primary outcome analysis was based on the first 38 patients recruited. After initial IR treatment, 11 patients (29%, 95% confidence interval 15% to 46%) achieved a CR, not reaching the pre-specified threshold. All other analyses were based on the full set of 39 evaluable patients. An overall response (OR) by 7 weeks was seen in 25 patients , comprising 12 CR and 13 PR. Sixteen patients (41%) were subsequently allocated to the low risk arm, 23 (59%) to high risk. , 26 patients (67%, 50% to 81%) achieved an OR (22 CR, 4 PR).

After a median follow up of 24 months, 1 year and 2 year outcomes are: PFS 63% (50% to 81%) and 56% (42% to 75%); post-IR PFS 72% (59% to 89%) and 65% (51% to 84%); OS 83% (72% to 96%) and 75% (62% to 92%).

Serious adverse events were most commonly infective (38%), and during IR-CHOP therapy (56%). Other common SAEs were gastrointestinal (31%) and haematological (9%). Two patient deaths due to sepsis and Pneumocystis pneumonia were related to treatment, 6 of the 7 further deaths were due to lymphoma.

Conclusions: Adding ibrutinib to rituximab for the initial treatment of PTLD did not result in a sufficiently high CR rate to warrant further investigation. Survival outcomes (PFS and OS) in our study are similar to those reported previously for rituximab with or without CHOP chemotherapy using a sequential risk stratified treatment approach. Of interest, in comparison to previous reports, a greater proportion of patients (41%) were allocated to low risk and continued IR therapy, thus avoiding cytotoxic chemotherapy. Therefore, the incorporation of novel agents in PTLD management merits further investigation to reduce treatment-related toxicity and improve survival.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2492
Pages (from-to)2492-2492
Number of pages1
JournalBlood
Volume138
Issue numberSupplement 1
Early online date5 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Nov 2021
EventASH Annual Meeting Abstracts -
Duration: 1 Dec 2005 → …

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk-stratified sequential treatment with ibrutinib and rituximab (IR) and IR-CHOP for de-novo post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: results of the tidal trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this