Abstract
Formal statehood at the national level may become in the future reduced to the relatively small, but vitally important role of the provision of safety – and this will call for a wider definition of statehood beyond the political formal ‘state’ as we know it. The Weberian and even the democratic state are not inclusive enough – or in some places any more – to reflect the social reality it exists in. The legitimacy of classical statehood is slowly, but constantly eroded from different directions. This chapter suggests an update on the understanding of Extended Statehood and a method of translating this improved understanding into a workable tool to practitioners in the field. We offer this model to the practitioner and soldier who either serve as part of a project to maintain or erect a state.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Was es (heute) heißt, Soldat zu sein |
| Editors | Gerhard Kümmel |
| Place of Publication | Baden-Baden |
| Publisher | Nomos |
| Chapter | 7 |
| Pages | 145-169 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-7489-2176-9 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-8487-7769-3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Bachmann, Olaf, Fouad G. Marei and Funmi Olonisakin. 2020. “Revisiting Governance: Extended Statehood in Africa and Beyond”, In: Was es (heute) heißt, Soldat zu sein., ed. by Gerhard Kümmel. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 145 – 169.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting Governance: Extended Statehood in Africa and Beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver