Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction.

Phillip Cassey; JG Ewen; AP Møller

doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3628

Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction.

Phillip Cassey
, JG Ewen
, AP Møller

Biosciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We provide a revision to the calculation of effect sizes and heterogeneity statistics in our original article, 'Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds' (Ewen et al. 2004). Our revision shows that significant heterogeneity in sex ratio study effect sizes does indeed exist and that for a series of key traits the average effect sizes (while still weak) are in fact significantly different from zero.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3129-30
Number of pages	2
Journal	Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences
Volume	273
Issue number	1605
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3628
Publication status	Published - 22 Dec 2006

Access to Document

10.1098/rspb.2006.3628

Cite this

@article{0ec3775ac13e4b7ca3c0f423f9df7887,

title = "Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction.",

abstract = "We provide a revision to the calculation of effect sizes and heterogeneity statistics in our original article, 'Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds' (Ewen et al. 2004). Our revision shows that significant heterogeneity in sex ratio study effect sizes does indeed exist and that for a series of key traits the average effect sizes (while still weak) are in fact significantly different from zero.",

author = "Phillip Cassey and JG Ewen and AP M{\o}ller",

year = "2006",

month = dec,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1098/rspb.2006.3628",

language = "English",

volume = "273",

pages = "3129--30",

journal = "Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences",

issn = "1471-2954",

publisher = "The Royal Society",

number = "1605",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction.

AU - Cassey, Phillip

AU - Ewen, JG

AU - Møller, AP

PY - 2006/12/22

Y1 - 2006/12/22

N2 - We provide a revision to the calculation of effect sizes and heterogeneity statistics in our original article, 'Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds' (Ewen et al. 2004). Our revision shows that significant heterogeneity in sex ratio study effect sizes does indeed exist and that for a series of key traits the average effect sizes (while still weak) are in fact significantly different from zero.

AB - We provide a revision to the calculation of effect sizes and heterogeneity statistics in our original article, 'Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds' (Ewen et al. 2004). Our revision shows that significant heterogeneity in sex ratio study effect sizes does indeed exist and that for a series of key traits the average effect sizes (while still weak) are in fact significantly different from zero.

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2006.3628

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2006.3628

M3 - Article

C2 - 17015370

SN - 1471-2954

SN - 1471-2970

VL - 273

SP - 3129

EP - 3130

JO - Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences

JF - Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences

IS - 1605

ER -

Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction.

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this