Abstract
We provide a revision to the calculation of effect sizes and heterogeneity statistics in our original article, 'Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds' (Ewen et al. 2004). Our revision shows that significant heterogeneity in sex ratio study effect sizes does indeed exist and that for a series of key traits the average effect sizes (while still weak) are in fact significantly different from zero.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3129-30 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences |
Volume | 273 |
Issue number | 1605 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Dec 2006 |