Review: Improving end-of-life care: a critical review of the Gold Standards Framework in primary care

Karen Shaw, Collette Clifford, Keri Thomas, H Meehan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Gold Standards Framework aims to optimize primary palliative care for patients nearing the end of their lives. This paper critically reviews the impact of the Gold Standards Framework since its introduction in 2001 and indicates direction for further research and development. Literature was accessed using specific databases and by contacting subject area specialists. The resultant literature was appraised using an established framework to evaluate healthcare interventions. Fifteen documents were reviewed. The quality of evidence is constrained by methodological limitations, but consistently demonstrates that the Gold Standards Framework improves general practice processes, co-working and the quality of palliative care. However, implementation of the Gold Standards Framework is variable and the direct impact on patients and carers is not known. We conclude that the Gold Standards Framework has considerable potential to improve end-of-life care, but further work is needed to support uptake and consistency of implementation. Additional evidence about patient and carer outcomes will add to existing insights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-329
Number of pages13
JournalPalliative Medicine
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2010

Keywords

  • Gold Standards Framework
  • primary care
  • end-of-life
  • general practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review: Improving end-of-life care: a critical review of the Gold Standards Framework in primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this