Retrospective case modelling to assess the impact of early intervention for voiding dysfunction after retropubic tape. When is it best to intervene?

M Huwyler, C Burton, A Renganathan, Pallavi Latthe, D Robinson, Matthew Parsons, L Cardozo, Philip Toozs-Hobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS This study is a retrospective modelling of early intervention for voiding difficulties (VD) after retropubic tape insertion. METHODS Chart review assessing Trial Without Catheter (TWOC) on day 2 and day 9 and long-term VD. Number needed to treat (NNT) analysis performed for presumed intervention on days 2 and 9. RESULTS Thirty seven (22%) of 171 patients failed TWOC on day 2, 20 (12%) on day 9. Ten (6%) had VD at 6 months. Five elected to have the tape cut. One had recurrence of SUI. NNT was 7.4:1 on day 2 and 4:1 on day 9 to avoid per tapes being cut at 6 months. Early intervention would potentially lead to six and three additional failures, respectively, assuming 80% continence. This represents over 100 per annum in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS The majority of VD after retropubic tape insertion will resolve. Early intervention may lead to additional failures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)823-7
Number of pages5
JournalInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retrospective case modelling to assess the impact of early intervention for voiding dysfunction after retropubic tape. When is it best to intervene?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this