Abstract
In this article, I argue that corporate governance rules and norms are an
essential determinant of the effectiveness of banking regulation. It follows that the existence of a corporate governance regime that can be complementary rather than antagonistic to regulatory objectives is indispensable for the success of external regulation. I show that the current corporate governance model applicable to banks, which is fundamentally the same as that applicable to generic companies—despite the recent Walker Review—is not fine-tuned to work as a complement to banking regulation but rather undermines the latter’s practical effectiveness. An overall rethink of corporate governance in the case of banks is thus necessary, as part of a broader restructuring of the banking industry in response to the recent crisis.
essential determinant of the effectiveness of banking regulation. It follows that the existence of a corporate governance regime that can be complementary rather than antagonistic to regulatory objectives is indispensable for the success of external regulation. I show that the current corporate governance model applicable to banks, which is fundamentally the same as that applicable to generic companies—despite the recent Walker Review—is not fine-tuned to work as a complement to banking regulation but rather undermines the latter’s practical effectiveness. An overall rethink of corporate governance in the case of banks is thus necessary, as part of a broader restructuring of the banking industry in response to the recent crisis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 612-629 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Law |
| Volume | 2012 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking banking prudential regulation : why corporate governance rules matter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver