Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Restrictive interventions: understanding and reducing their use in mental health settings

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

323 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Restrictive interventions, which include enhanced observations, seclusion and restraint, are associated with significant and far-reaching harm for patients, staff and those who witness their use. They should only ever be used as the last resort. However, mental health professionals often encounter patient behaviours that challenge, which can include violence, which may prompt them to use restrictive interventions. The primary prevention of patient behaviours that challenge is crucial to reduce the need for restrictive interventions in mental health settings.

This article discusses the different types of restrictive interventions and describes some strategies that can support reduction of their use in mental health settings. The authors also consider some of the legal and ethical aspects of restrictive interventions and identify the importance of adopting a trauma-informed approach to care.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1620
JournalMental Health Practice
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Aug 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Control and restraint
  • Ethical issues
  • Human rights
  • patient safety
  • Professional
  • Seclusion
  • Mental Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restrictive interventions: understanding and reducing their use in mental health settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this