Response to Davis and Plaisted-Grant: Psychophysical data do not support the low-noise account of autism

Catherine Manning^*, Daniel H. Baker

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{72e50c8c3ec84ae4976bfcac97fcf60f,

title = "Response to Davis and Plaisted-Grant: Psychophysical data do not support the low-noise account of autism",

author = "Catherine Manning and Baker, \{Daniel H.\}",

year = "2015",

month = apr,

day = "20",

doi = "10.1177/1362361314557164",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "365--366",

journal = "Autism",

issn = "1362-3613",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Davis and Plaisted-Grant

T2 - Psychophysical data do not support the low-noise account of autism

AU - Manning, Catherine

AU - Baker, Daniel H.

PY - 2015/4/20

Y1 - 2015/4/20

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84924981138

U2 - 10.1177/1362361314557164

DO - 10.1177/1362361314557164

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 25492972

AN - SCOPUS:84924981138

SN - 1362-3613

VL - 19

SP - 365

EP - 366

JO - Autism

JF - Autism

IS - 3

ER -