Response to Comment on "Sedimentary DNA from a submerged site reveals wheat in the British Isles 8000 years ago"

O. Smith, G. Momber, R. Bates, P. Garwood, S. Fitch, M. Pallen, V. Gaffney, R. G. Allaby

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bennett questions the rigor of the dating of our sample from which sedimentary ancient DNA was obtained and the reliability of the taxonomic identification of wheat. We present a further radiocarbon date from S308 that confirms the lateral consistency of the palaeosol age. The suggestion of taxonomic false positives in our data illustrates a misinterpretation of the phylogenetic intersection analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-247
Number of pages1
JournalScience
Volume349
Issue number6245
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Comment on "Sedimentary DNA from a submerged site reveals wheat in the British Isles 8000 years ago"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this